AAS Committee on the Status of Women
Issue of January 29, 2010
eds. Joan Schmelz, Caroline Simpson, & Michele Montgomery
This week's issues:
1. CSWA Sponsors Special Sssion at AAS 216th Meeting - First Announcement
2. AAS 216th Meeting CSWA Town Hall Meeting - First Announcement
3. Self-Doubt Plagues Female Astronomers
4. WIA Blogspot: Employment in Astronomy
5. Academy Honors Geller for Major Contributions to Science
6. How to Become a Grant Reviewer
7. Postdoctoral Position at the University of Manitoba
8. How to Submit, Subscribe, or Unsubscribe to AASWOMEN
9. Access to Past Issues of AASWOMEN
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. CSWA Sponsors Special Sssion at AAS 216th Meeting - First Announcement
From: Joan T Schmelz [jschmelz
memphis.edu]
The Committee on the Status of Women in Astronomy is sponsoring a
special session at the 216th AAS meeting May 23-27 in Miami, FL on
"Addressing Unconscious Bias."
We all have biases, and we are (for the most part) unaware of them. In
general, men and women BOTH unconsciously devalue the contributions of
women. This can have a detrimental effect on grant proposals, job
applications, and performance reviews. Sociology is way ahead of
astronomy in these studies. When evaluating identical application
packages, male and female University psychology professors preferred
2:1 to hire "Brian" over "Karen" as an assistant professor. When
evaluating a more experienced record (at the point of promotion to
tenure), reservations were expressed four times more often when the
name was female. This unconscious bias has a repeated negative effect
on Karen's career. Ref: Steinpreis, Anders, & Ritzke (1999) Sex Roles,
41, 509.
In this session, we want to introduce the concept of unconscious bias
and also give recommendations on how to address it using an example
for a faculty search committee. The process of eliminating unconscious
bias begins with awareness, then moves to policy and practice, and
ends with accountability. We plan to use the information from the
University of Michigan Advance STRIDE web site as a guideline
http://sitemaker.umich.edu/advance/stride .
The exact time, date, and room location will be in our second announcement.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. AAS 216th Meeting Town Hall Meeting - First Announcement
From: Joan T Schmelz [jschmelzmemphis.edu]
The Committee on the Status of Women in Astronomy is sponsoring a town
hall meeting at the 216th AAS meeting May 23-27 in Miami, FL on
"Designing a 21st Century Astronomy Career Track"
Is your Department/Organization/Institution "Female-Friendly?" It
can't be all about numbers, but if the percentage of women at all
levels is typical, is that good enough, or is it only the first step?
If there are no senior women at the highest level, can a place really
be female-friendly? How important are role models and mentoring? Is
your Department/Organization/Institution "Family-Friendly?" Is there a
family leave policy and nearby affordable childcare? How important are
e.g., flexible hours and the option to stop the tenure (or equivalent
for non-academic positions) clock? The CSWA Town Hall at the Miami AAS
meeting will take up the challenge of designing a 21st century
astronomy career track. The Town Hall will include at least 30 minutes
for discussion and answering questions from the audience.
The exact time, date, and room location will be in our second announcement.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Self-Doubt Plagues Female Astronomers
From: Ann Hornschemeier [Ann.Hornschemeiernasa.gov]
Although this [subject] has already been reported, I think the fact
that it has just appeared in Nature is notable:
[Please see the article on the AIP longitudinal study that seeks
insight into astronomer's career path.]
http://www.nature.com/naturejobs/2010/100128/full/nj7280-574a.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. WIA Blogspot: Employment in Astronomy
From: HannahWomen in Astronomy Blog, January 26, 2010
I've been promising a write-up of the Employment Special Session from
the AAS Meeting, but honestly? I'm having trouble writing it because
I'm having trouble detaching myself from the subject, since I'm on the
job market myself. So, instead, I'm going to talk here about the
Rumo(u)r Mill [http://cdm.berkeley.edu/doku.php?id=astrophysicsjobs].
The rumour mill is a clearinghouse for gossip about who make
shortlists, gets offers, and lands jobs in astrophysics, said jobs
being almost exclusively in academia. On the one hand, it's the one
weapon that we peons job hunters have against The Man. Knowledge is
power and all that. On the other hand, it can also be a vortex of pain
and suffering as you realize that the plum job you applied for has
already drawn up its shortlist and you're not on it.
There's currently a raging debate in the revisions section on whether
or not to post about people who leave astronomy. You can even answer a
poll on the subject. (Currently, the ayes have it.) My own opinion is
that it would be useful information to have. One of the reasons for
the Longitudinal Survey, after all, is that there is little data on
what happens to the people who leave astronomy. Do women
preferentially leave academic astronomy? Why? I think the data would
be great to have.
[To read the rest of this article, please see
http://womeninastronomy.blogspot.com/]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Academy Honors Geller for Major Contributions to Science
From: WIPHYS January 25, 2010
The National Academy of Sciences (NAS) will honor 17 individuals with
awards in recognition of extraordinary scientific achievements in the
areas of biology, chemistry, geology, astronomy, and psychology.
Among the 2010 recipients is Margaret J. Geller, senior scientist at
the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory and the recipient of the
James Craig Watson Medal. Geller is being honored for her role in
critical discoveries concerning the large-scale structure of the
universe, for her insightful analyses of galaxies in groups and
clusters, and for her being a model in mentoring young scientists.
The award consisting of a medal, a $25,000 prize, and a gift of
$25,000 to an institution of the recipient's choosing –recognizes
contributions in astronomy. An awards ceremony for the recipients
will take place on April 25 during the Academy's annual meeting.
The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit honorific
society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and
engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and
technology and to their use for the general welfare. Since 1863, the
National Academy of Sciences has served to investigate, examine,
experiment, and report upon any subject of science or art whenever
called upon to do so by any department of the government.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. How to Become a Grant Reviewer
From: Michele M. Montgomery [montgomeryphysics.ucf.edu]
One of the best ways to learn how a grant proposal is reviewed and to
increase your chances of getting funded is to become a grant reviewer.
There are two ways you can get your name in consideration for a
grant review panel: Write the program officer of a particular grant
that you have an interest in or submit a CV for consideration. For
the former, include your resume in the letter, and express your
interest in being considered to be a reviewer for the next grant cycle
of their program. For the latter, submit your CV for consideration
and express your interest in several specific grant programs.
NSF: To become an NSF reviewer, send an e-mail to the NSF program
officer(s) of the program(s) that fits your expertise. Introduce
yourself and identify your areas of expertise, and let them know that
you are interested in becoming a peer reviewer. It is most helpful if
you also attach a 2-page CV with current contact information. NSF
welcomes qualified reviewers from the academic, industrial, and
government sectors. For more information, go to
http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/meritreview/reviewer.jsp .
ED: The U.S. Department of Education (ED) seeks qualified individuals
interested in reviewing applications for grant programs of the Office
of Postsecondary Education (OPE). These reviewers (also called field
readers or peer reviewers) will independently read and evaluate grant
applications submitted to OPE. For more information on how to become
a peer reviewer, go to
http://opeweb.ed.gov/frs/frsHome.cfm .
DOE: For more information on the merit review of grant applications
as well as other Federal policies and procedures concerning the
Department's grant process, visit:
http://www.sc.doe.gov/production/grants/grants.html#Merit%20Review .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Postdoctoral Position at the University of Manitoba
From: Samar Safi-Harb [samarphysics.umanitoba.ca]
Applications are invited for a postdoctoral position in the department
of Physics and Astronomy at the University of Manitoba in Winnipeg,
Canada. The successful applicant will collaborate with Prof. Samar
Safi-Harb and her group on supernova remnants (SNRs),
pulsar wind nebulae (PWNe), and/or compact objects (see
http://www.physics.umanitoba.ca/~samar/
for more details). The position is available in 2010 (with a
negotiable start date) and the initial appointment is for one year,
renewable for up to 2 more years, subject to performance and funding.
The funds for this position are made available through the Canada
Research Chairs program. The successful applicant will have a PhD as
of the start date of the appointment. Candidates with previous
experience in observational studies or modeling of SNRs, PWNe, or
neutron stars are encouraged to apply. Strong applicants with a
theoretical background will be nominated for the CITA National
Fellowship. The successful candidate will have access to a
high-performance computing system funded by the Canada Foundation for
Innovation.
Applications should include a CV (including a publication list and
contact information for up to 3 referees), a description of research
interests and plans. Applications should be sent by email to
samarphysics.umanitoba.ca. Review of applications will begin March
15, 2010 and will continue until the position is filled.
The University of Manitoba is the province's largest,
research-intensive post-secondary education institution, located near
the geographical centre of North America and at the confluence of
Assiniboine and Red Rivers. As the capital city of Manitoba, Winnipeg
is a mature city of some 700,000 people with rich recreational and
cultural opportunities. It combines the amenities of urban life with
easy access to the countryside and to northern lakes and forests.
The University exercises a Canadian-first policy; however, all those
qualified are encouraged to apply.
Application materials, including letters of reference, will be handled
in accordance with the protection of privacy provisions of The Freedom
of Information and Protection of Privacy (Manitoba). Please note that
your curriculum vitae may be provided to participating members of the
search process.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
8. How to Submit, Subscribe, or Unsubscribe to AASWOMEN
[Please remember to replace "" in the below e-mail addresses.]
To submit to AASWOMEN: send email to aaswomenaas.org All material
sent to that address will be posted unless you tell us otherwise
(including your email address).
To subscribe or unsubscribe to AASWOMEN go to
http://lists.aas.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aaswomen
and fill out the form.
If you experience any problems, please email itdeptaas.org
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
9. Access to Past Issues of AASWOMEN
Past issues of AASWOMEN are available at
http://www.aas.org/cswa/AASWOMEN.html
Each annual summary includes an index of topics covered.
AASWList mailing list AASWListaas.org
AASWList mailing list
AASWListaas.org