CSWA Logo AAS Logo







Senior Women: A Comparison of Astronomy Organizations

by Joan T. Schmelz, CSWA Chair

Senior women in astronomy provide us with mentors and role models. They can change or even transform the culture, dynamics, and environment of a department or research group. They can stand with us and fight for us if we find ourselves the victim of gender discrimination, sexual harassment, or unconscious bias. They can make an organization more female friendly.

CSWA began compiling a list of the percentage of women among the tenured faculty members of Ph.D. astronomy departments in the US. This list has now been expanded to include the percentage of women researchers/faculty/staff with tenure or the equivalent for US astronomy institutes/universities/observatories. For US government installations such as NASA GSFC, the equivalent of tenure is considered to be a civil service appointment. Numbers and percentages were confirmed by a member of each organization.

The table below shows that the range is wide, with Indiana University leading the pack with 50% women on the tenured faculty, but with some other institutions still in the single digits. The average is 15.1%, with a standard deviation of 10.6%.

For comparison, 18% of full members of the AAS are women. In addition, 30% of named postdocs have been women for the past 20 years; they represent some of the most highly qualified potential candidates for tenure-track positions. These data are public domain and were compiled by the demographics panel for Astro 2010. We received special permission to share the results at the 2009 Women in Astronomy III conference. Here's a link to the paper.

Why tenured women? Other surveys of women in astronomy have been more general. See, for example, the article in the June 2004 issue of STATUS entitled, “Portrait of a Decade: Results from the 2003 CSWA Survey of Women in Astronomy” by Jennifer Hoffman and Meg Urry.

In my mind, tenure means success. Of course, there are many ways to succeed in astronomy, but tenure may be the most universal. This survey was narrowly focused to begin to answer a very specific question, "Are women succeeding in astronomy?” One way to answer this question is, "Yes, individual women have always succeeded in astronomy." Another answer, related to the group rather than the individual is, "Yes, but progress is all too slow."

This list is meant to be an evolving document, so as members of your organization get tenure, retire, arrive, leave, etc., we invite you to send the new numbers to CSWA so we can keep an accurate tally. Please feel free to contact us with any changes, updates, and questions. Also, if you would like to add your department or research organization to the list, please send us the necessary figures.

Notes to table:
  • For joint appointments, we include the fraction of time devoted to astronomy.
  • These data are for the entire department, not just the astronomy component of a department.
  • Assistant professors, research professors, junior members, part-time instructors, soft-money researchers, postdocs, emeritus faculty, etc. are not included in this list.

% Women # Women # Men Organization Department Joint Appts. Updated
50.0 4 4 Indiana Univ. Astronomy Dec 2, 2011
40.0 2 3 Gemini Obs. Astronomy Jun 17, 2012
33.3 4 8 Univ. of Washington Astronomy 2011
33.3 3 6 New Mexico Tech Physics 2011
33.3 1 2 Case West. Res. Univ. Astronomy 2011
30.0 3 7 Yale Univ. Astronomy 2011
29.2 3.5 8.5 Caltech Astronomy 2011
28.0 1.75 4.5 Univ. of Wisconsin Astronomy 1 at 0.75; 1 at 0.5 2011
27.2 28 75 NASA GSFC Solar System Dec 3, 2012
25.5 37 108 NASA GSFC Earth Sciences Dec 3, 2012
25.0 2 6 New Mexico State Univ. Astronomy Dec 2, 2011
23.8 5 16 UCSC Astronomy & Astrophysics 2011
23.1 3 10 Univ. of Michigan Astronomy 2011
23.1 3 10 Columbia Univ. Astronomy 2011
22.4 3 10.4 Ohio State Astronomy 1 at 0.25; 3 at 0.05 2011
20.8 15 57 NASA GSFC Astrophysics 2011
20.0 4 16 Univ. of Arizona Astronomy 2011
20.0 2 8 Univ. of Minnesota Astronomy 2011
19.0 2 8.5 Princeton Univ. Astrophysical Sciences 1 at 0.5 2011
16.7 3 15 UCLA Astronomy & Astrophysics 2011
15.7 8 43 NASA GSFC Heliophysics 2011
15.0 3 17 Univ. of Colorado Astrophysical & Planet. Sci. 2011
15.0 3 17 Rensselaer Poly. Ins. Physics 2011
14.3 4 24 Yale Univ. Physics 2011
14.3 2 12 Univ. of Florida Astronomy 2011
14.3 2 12 Univ. of Mass. Astronomy 2011
13.8 2 12.5 Univ. of Maryland Astronomy 1 at 0.5 Nov 28, 2011
13.6 3 19 Northwestern Univ. Physics & Astronomy 2 at 0.5 2011
12.5 2 14 Penn State Astronomy & Astrophysics 2011
12.5 1 7 Univ. of Illinois Astronomy 2 at 0.5 2011
11.8 2 15 UC Berkeley Astronomy 2011
11.1 2 16 Florida Inter. Univ. Physics 2011
11.1 4 32 Univ. of Hawaii Physics & Astronomy Jun 17, 2012
10.5 2 17 NOAO Astronomy 2011
10.5 6 51 Rutgers Physics & Astronomy Jun 17, 2012
10.5 4 34 STScI Astronomy Nov 28, 2011
10.0 1 9 Arizona State Univ. Astrophysics 2011
10.0 2 18 Univ. of Texas, Austin Astronomy 2011
10.0 2 18 Univ. of Toledo Physics & Astronomy Nov 17, 2011
9.5 2 19 Cornell Univ. Astronomy 2011
9.3 5 49 Smithsonian Astro. Obs. (CfA) Astronomy 2011
8.3 3 33 Louisiana State Univ. Physics & Astronomy 2011
8.3 1 11 Harvard Univ. (CfA) Astronomy 4 at 0.5 2011
8.1 2.5 28.5 Rice Univ. Physics & Astronomy 5 at 0.5 2011
8.0 2 23 NRAO Astronomy Jun 17, 2012
7.7 1 12 Boston Univ. Astronomy 2011
7.7 2 24 Vanderbilt Univ. Physics & Astronomy Nov 29, 2011
7.5 4 49 MIT Physics 2011
7.1 4 52 Texas A&M Univ. Physics & Astronomy 2011
6.8 2 27.5 Univ. of Delaware Physics & Astronomy 1 at 0.5 2011
6.4 3 44 Stony Brook Univ. Physics & Astronomy 2011
5.6 2 34 Iowa State Univ. Physics & Astronomy 2011
4.7 1 20.5 Univ. of Chicago Astronomy & Astrophysics 3 at 0.5 2011
4.0 1 24 Johns Hopkins Univ. Physics & Astronomy 2011
0.0 0 13 Georgia State Univ. Physics & Astronomy Dec 2, 2011
0.0 0 8 National Solar Obs. Astronomy Dec 6, 2011
0.0 0 21 Univ. of Utah Physics & Astronomy 2011
0.0 0 13 Univ. of Virginia Astronomy Nov 28, 2011
0.0 0 7 Univ. of Wyoming Physics & Astronomy Nov 17, 2011


For additional comparative data (posted by the webmaster):

For comparative data for 2003, 2005, 2007, readers may consult the data on race and gender balance in the faculties of the top fifty departments in various scientific and engineering fields, including astronomy, compiled by Dr. Donna J. Nelson of The University of Oklahoma.

Data for named and unnamed postdocs, 1995 - 2005, are given in Hoffman, Modjaz, West, and Graham 2009, "Transitional States: Addressing the Gender Imbalance Among Postdoctoral Researchers at UC Berkeley," in Women in Astronomy and Space Science: Meeting the Challenges of an Increasingly Diverse Workforce, Proceedings from the conference held at The Inn and Conference Center University of Maryland University College, October 21—23, 2009, edited by Anne L. Kinney, Diana Khachadourian, Pamela S. Millar and Colleen N. Hartman, p. 213, and in J. Schmelz et al. 2009, "The 30% Benchmark: Women in Astronomy Postdocs at US Institutions" ibid., p. 234

CSWA home page



This page last updated: December 3, 2012