Resources on the two-body problem from PhDs.org

"Dual-Career Academic Couples: What Universities Need to Know" (PDF, 696KB) from Stanford University's Clayman Institute for Gender Research

1. "Partnering Patterns in the Academic Workforce" (who partners with whom; who gets hired)
2. "Academic Couples: Career Paths and Priorities" (mobility and trade-offs)
3. "University Programs, Policies, and Practices: How to Maximize Options?"

"Dual Career Couples," from a resource page entitled, "Preparing for an Academic Career in the Geosciences"

• Case Studies: Geoscience Dual Career Couples
• Articles from the Chronicle of Higher Education
• Articles from the Tomorrow's Professor Email List

"The 2-Body Problem: New Advice for an Old Problem?" by Heidi Hammel, Megan Donahue, et al., from our advice page

"Solving the 2-body problem isn't always easy. But, you know, a lot of us have that problem these days, so the smart employers are learning how to, if anything, solve the 2-body problem to their advantage. I believe that a lot of progress has been made in this regard over the last 20-30 years, simply because it's a lot more common to have 2-career couples in any field and the system has realized there's an economical advantage to dealing with it."

"Institutional and Individual Solutions to the Two-Body Problem"

"Solving the Two-Body Problem," by Anurag Agrawal and Jennifer Thaler, in Science Careers (2003)

"Our story is evidence that the two-body problem can be solved. ... Through our experience, and the experiences of other couples we know, we've assembled some advice for dual-career couples in the process of applying for academic jobs, where the goal is two tenure-track positions."

Special Report, "The familial balancing act," by Sally Goodman, in Nature (2005)

"A dual dilemma," by Karen Kaplan, in Nature (2010)

"Recruiters say couples must use deliberate tactics to ensure that both members secure desirable employment. Before even applying for positions, candidates need to determine how specific institutions view the issue — whether they're receptive to it or at least have clear policies on it, or whether they shrug at a candidate's partnered status. And, once the application process is under way, candidates must properly time the disclosure of their partnered status (see 'Negotiating for two')."

"Negotiating for two," by Karen Kaplan, in Nature (2010)

"One of the biggest dilemmas for a partnered scientist who is seeking a job is determining exactly when to disclose that he or she has a partner with an active research career. Department chairs, hiring executives and the scientists themselves have different opinions on the optimal timing ..."

Comments on the two-body problem, especially on handling imminent childbirth during hiring negotiations, from the Female Science Professor Blog

Several readers share their experiences.

"The Two-Body Opportunity," from ACS Careers, posted April 30, 2012

Even before you begin a job search, you and your spouse need to seriously consider and discuss your values, professional goals, and family goals. What must you have as a couple? What would be nice, but not necessary? What are you willing to do without?

In addition to what you need as a family, you should discuss what each of you individually needs and wants. One partner might need challenging work, while the other needs the security of a steady paycheck. You need to decide on a strategy that will work for both of you – will one person’s career always lead, and the other always follow? Will you take turns getting priority when it’s time for a change? ...

"Dual Career Challenges," by Sue V. Rosser, from Inside Higher Ed, July 18, 2012

'Couples in all fields, and particularly those in academe, face struggles over career priorities. For women scientists, the issue is especially acute since, as the Clayman Institute report documented, 83 percent of women scientists are partnered with other scientists, compared to 54 percent of men scientists. The following interviews with academic women scientists (presented here with pseudonyms) illustrate various issues raised by the dual career opportunity.'

"Gender and the Dual Career Academic Couple," by Lisa Wade, from "Sociological Images," on The Society Pages

'In an effort to map the shape of the dual career challenge, the Clayman Institute for Research on Gender at Stanford University did a survey of 30,000 faculty at 13 universities. The study was headed by Londa Schiebinger, Andrea Henderson, and Shannon Gilmartin.' ...

'For women who are partnered with another academic, the data is starker than the 6 point difference above would suggest. The researchers asked members of dual-career academic couples, whose job comes first? Half of men said that theirs did, compared to only 20% of women. When it comes to balancing competing career demands, then, women may be more willing to compromise than men.'

"We Met in Graduate School," by Jon T. Coleman in The Chronicle of Higher Education, September 23, 2012

' ... Just as we did, my students see many dual-career academics whose partnerships function, for better or worse. They see the survivors, the ones who ran the gantlet of endless dissertation revisions, tricky job searches, and nerve-racking tenure decisions.

'They don't see the trailing spouses who never got hired, or the couples who divorced and moved on, or the full-time/half-time arrangements that collapsed, or the adjunct professors who worked so many jobs they had scant time to be a couple. They don't see the partnerships torn apart by publishing demands, asymmetrical career prospects, or odious commutes. The casualties simply aren't around to instruct them.

...

'Telling our stories might be the best gift our generation could hand down to the next. Indeed, an archive of our weird, inspirational, and tragic sagas would serve posterity well - as long as we adhere to some rules.'

[To see the rules, read on.]

"A Career for Two, With Empathy," by Elisabeth Pain, from Science Career Profiles, October 5, 2012

Story of the career of a couple who work together more closely than most couples. Interesting.