AAS ACTION ALERT 2000-5
Summary
AAS
members should write letters to their members of Congress and members of the
appropriations committees supporting the House VA-HUD-IA appropriations
subcommittee report and seeking funding levels for NSF closer to the Administration’s
request. The length of this alert is
due to the addresses provided at the end of the email.
Background
On
May 23, the House VA-HUD-IA Appropriations Subcommittee (the subcommittee
responsible for NASA and NSF appropriations) sent their draft VA-HUD-IA
appropriations bill to the full House Appropriations Committee for
approval. Approval of this draft
legislation, or report, is the first stage of the appropriations process. The House Appropriations Committee will
probably meet to edit and approve the bill sometime in mid-June, or
earlier. To have an impact on the House
version of the legislation, letters must arrive before June 5 or 6.
Overall, the report is very favorable to astronomy
and space science. Significantly, the
portion of the report covering appropriations for NASA’s Office of Space
Science contains no earmarks (unlike previous year’s reports). However, the report does propose a reduction
of $20 million for the ‘Living With a Star’ initiative, which is a new start
program for FY 2001. Justification for
the reduction was not included in the report language, but the subcommittee did
request NASA’s Inspector General to review the program’s administration to
“ensure that contract awards are made only after full and open competition.” The report goes on to state “until the
review is complete, the subcommittee recommends no funding for the program in
fiscal year 2001.” No further
explanation for this reduction was available.
It cannot be stressed too heavily that this is one
of the first times in recent memory that the NASA appropriations bill came out
of subcommittee without significant reductions or earmarks. The members of the subcommittee should be
heartily thanked for adhering closely to the administration’s request for NASA’s
Space Science activities.
The report language dealing with NSF’s budget did
contain significantly reduced funding levels compared with the administration’s
request. In addition to reductions to a
number of other directorates’ proposed FY 2001 budgets, the Mathematics and
Physical Science (MPS) directorate would only receive an increase of 5.9% (~ $
45 million to $ 803 million) if the subcommittee report is passed by the full
committee. The administration originally
requested an increase of 16.3% ($ 124 million to $ 881 million). Exactly how this reduction would affect the
Astronomy Division (AST) is unknown, but the large percentage increase slated
for the grants program (administration request = +37% or up $ 24 million to $60
million total) would be a likely target for reduction. The committee also reduced the Major
Research Equipment line from the requested level of $ 139 million to $ 77
million. Details on exactly what items
were reduced are not yet available.
This line is important for astronomy, as it has funded telescopes such
as the Very Large Array and the Gemini telescopes.
The next step in the appropriations process is
approval of the subcommittee report by the full House Appropriations Committee,
followed by similar action by the Senate appropriations subcommittee and full
committee. Because this is an election
year, the process has moved on a much faster schedule than normal. Input must be made now to have any impact at
all.
Request for Action
AAS members are encouraged to perform three simple
tasks to help the situation for Astronomy funding for FY 2001. Remember to keep your letters to one concise
page and to add some personal detail to the letters to your own legislators.
1)
Write
to the members of the House VA-HUD-IA Appropriations Subcommittee (addresses
below) thanking them for the favorable markup.
You may wish to especially thank them for their budgetary and policy
leadership as demonstrated by the lack of earmarks in the NASA OSS budget.
2)
Write
to your own Representatives and Senators supporting the Administration’s
proposed funding levels for NASA and NSF, especially those for NASA’s Office of
Space Science and the MPS Directorate at NSF.
Ask your members of Congress to encourage their colleagues on the House
and Senate Appropriations Committees to follow the Administration’s
request. The Physics division, the
Office of Polar Programs and the Education and Human Resources (EHR)
Directorate, also fund some astronomical related research and programs. Finally, the Major Research Equipment budget
line has funded the construction of national observing facilities and should
always be endorsed when possible. No
telescopes, no research is the basic message here.
3)
Write
to the members of the House Appropriations Committee, the Senate VA-HUD-IA
Subcommittee and the Senate Appropriations Committee (addresses below)
supporting the House version of the VA-HUD-IA Appropriations bill. No bill number has been assigned, so
mention it by name.
(NOTE: The following sample letter is meant as an
EXAMPLE only! Letters should be
personally written and contain a basic message and some level of personal
detail. Your voice will carry far more
weight using this method than by using form letters. Besides, you may not agree with all the opinions expressed in the
sample letter below, but still support its overall message. )
Sample Letter
Senator Kit Bond
Senate VA-HUD-IA Appropriations Subcommittee
Washington, DC 20510
Dear Senator Bond,
I
am writing to ask that you follow the example of the House VA-HUD-IA
appropriations subcommittee and at least meet their markup levels for the
VA-HUD-IA appropriations bill.
As
you know, both NASA and NSF fund Astronomy and Space Science. NASA’s Office of Space Science supports
space-based and balloon-borne astronomical research efforts (such as the Hubble
Space Telescope or the Boomerang Antarctic balloon experiment) while NSF
provides grants to individual researchers, ground-based observing facilities
(such as the Gemini telescopes, the Arecibo radio telescope and the Very Large
Array) and educational/outreach funding as well as partnering with NASA on a
variety of projects. These agencies
have made the United States astronomy research enterprise the best in the world
today. However, ultimately the true
responsibility for our Nation’s success is Congress’ leadership and foresight
in providing adequate funds for our researchers to succeed in their research
endeavors.
The
House VA-HUD-IA appropriations subcommittee version of the VA-HUD-IA
appropriations bill is a fine example of Congressional leadership in this
regard. Working within the subcommittee
allocations, the members were able to nearly fully fund the Administration’s
request for NASA’s Office of Space Science and provide a significant increase
for the Mathematics and Physical Science Directorate at NSF. I hope your subcommittee will try to do the
same. Although some room for
improvement for NSF’s budget still exists, there can be no doubt that the
funding levels passed by the subcommittee are substantially adequate for our
Nation’s astronomers to move into the next fiscal year well prepared for the
discoveries ahead
Thank you again for your continued support of
scientific research in the United States.
Your support for NSF, NASA and other research-oriented agencies has been
strong. I know you continue to
appreciate the importance of scientific research and the benefits it provides
our Nation. Please provide the funds
that will let scientists fulfill their role of providing the know how to keep
our Nation at the forefront of research and technology. If I can be of any service to your office or
your committee, do not hesitate to call on me.
Sincerely,
Iama S. Upernova
ADDRESSES
You can find the addresses for your own
Congressional representatives on the AAS Public Policy Web pages: http://www.aas.org/policy/Contact.html
All House Addresses are: Washington, DC 20515
All Senate Addresses are: Washington, DC 20510
Since there are so many members of the House
Appropriations Committees, first send letters to the chair and ranking member
(Young, Obey) of the full committee and the chair and ranking member of the
VA-HUD-IA subcommittee (Walsh,Mollohan) and any members from your home state or
a state you go to observe or do research).
The Senate Chair and Ranking Member of the full
committee are Stevens and Byrd. The
VA-HUD-IA subcommittee Chair and Ranking Member are Bond and Mikulski.
VA-HUD-IA subcommittee members are marked with a *
next to their room number.
House
Appropriations Members
State Name Building & Room
Alabama
Robert Aderholt LHOB
1007
Sonny Callahan RHOB
2466
Robert Cramer
RHOB 2350 *
Arizona
Jim Kolbe RHOB 2266
Ed Pastor RHOB 2465
Arkansas
Jay Dickey RHOB 2453
California
Randy Cunningham RHOB
2238
Julian Dixon RHOB 2252
Sam Farr LHOB 1221
Jerry Lewis RHOB 2112
Ron Packard RHOB 2372
Nancy Pelosi RHOB 2457
Lucille Roybal-Allard
RHOB 2435
Connecticut
Rosa DeLauro CHOB 436
Florida
F. Allen Boyd CHOB 107
Carrie Meek CHOB 401 *
Dan Miller CHOB 102
C.W. Young RHOB 2407
Georgia
Jack Kingston LHOB 1034
Illinois
Jesse Jackson CHOB 313
John Porter RHOB 2373
Indiana
Peter Visclosky RHOB
2313
Iowa
Tom Latham CHOB 324
Kansas
Todd Tiahrt CHOB 428
Kentucky
Anne Northup LHOB
1004 *
Harold Rogers RHOB 2470
Maryland
Steny Hoyer LHOB 1705
Massachusetts
John Olver LHOB 1027
Michigan
Carolyn Kilpatrick CHOB
503
Joseph
Knollenberg RHOB 2349
*
Minnesota
Martin Olav Sabo RHOB
2336
Mississippi
Roger Wicker CHOB 206 *
Missouri
Jo Ann Emerson CHOB 132
New
Hampshire
John Sununu
CHOB 316 *
New Jersey
Rodney Frelinghuysen
CHOB 228 *
New Mexico
Joe Skeen RHOB 2302
New York
Maurice Hinchey RHOB
2431
Nita Lowey
RHOB 2421
Jose Serrano RHOB 2342
James Walsh RHOB 2351 *
North
Carolina
David Price RHOB 2162 *
Charles Taylor CHOB 231
Ohio
David Hobson LHOB 1514 *
Marcy Kaptur RHOB 2366 *
Ralph Regula RHOB 2309
Oklahoma
Ernest Istook RHOB 2404
Pennsylvania
John Murtha
RHOB 2423
John Peterson CHOB 307
South
Carolina
James Clyburn CHOB 319
Tennessee
Zach Wamp CHOB 423
Texas
Henry Bonilla LHOB 1427
Tom DeLay CHOB 341 *
Chet Edwards RHOB 2459
Kay Granger CHOB 435
Virginia
James Moran RHOB 2239
Frank Wolf
CHOB 241
Washington
Norman Dicks RHOB 2467
George Nethercutt LHOB
1527
West
Virginia
Alan Mollohan RHOB 2346 *
Wisconsin
David Obey
RHOB 2314
Senate
Appropriations Members
State Name
Building Room
Alabama
Richard Shelby Hart 110 *
Alaska
Ted Stevens Hart 522
Arizona
Jon Kyl Hart
724 *
California
Dianne Feinstein Hart
331
Colorado
Ben Nighthorse Russell 380
Hawaii
Daniel Inouye Hart 722
Idaho
Larry Craig
Hart 520 *
Illinois
Richard Durbin Russell 364
Iowa
Tom Harkin Hart 731 *
Kentucky
Mitch McConnell Russell 361A
Maryland
Barbara Mikulski
Hart 709 *
Mississippi
Thad Cochran Russell 326
Missouri
Christopher Bond Russell
274 *
Montana
Conrad Burns Dirksen 187 *
Nevada
Harry Reid
Hart 528
New
Hampshire
Judd Gregg Russell 393
New Jersey
Frank Lautenberg Hart
506 *
New Mexico
Pete Domenici Hart 328
North Dakota
Byron Dorgan
Hart 713
Pennsylvania
Arlen Specter Hart 711
South
Carolina
Ernest Hollings Russell 125
Texas
Kay Bailey Hutchison
Russell 284 *
Utah
Robert Bennett
Dirksen 431
Vermont
Patrick Leahy Russell 433 *
Washington
Slade Gorton Hart 730
Patty Murray Russell 173
West
Virginia
Robert Byrd
Hart 311
Wisconsin
Herbert Kohl Hart 330